ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of intradural spinal metastases: a comparative analysis between intramedullary and extramedullary lesions.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntradural spinal metastases, including intramedullary (IM) and intradural extramedullary (IDEM) lesions, are rare manifestations of advanced systemic malignancy, and the role of surgery remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify how anatomical compartments influence surgical intent, feasibility, and postoperative neurological outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed fifteen consecutive patients who underwent surgery for intradural spinal metastases between 2010 and 2024. Lesions were classified as IM (n = 6) or IDEM (n = 9). Clinical presentation, operative characteristics, extent of resection, and adjuvant therapy were evaluated. Neurological function was assessed using the modified McCormick scale (MMCS) before and after surgery.
resultsIM lesions were more frequently associated with severe preoperative neurological impairment and were predominantly located in the thoracic spine, whereas IDEM lesions were distributed across cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels. Gross total resection was achieved more often in IDEM lesions (44.4%) than in IM lesions (16.7%). Postoperatively, neurological function improved in 5 patients (33.3%), remained stable in 6 (40.0%), and deteriorated in 4 (26.7%). Although improvement occurred in both groups, IDEM lesions more often achieved a favorable final functional status (MMCS grades I-II), whereas IM lesions frequently showed limited functional recovery. No perioperative complications were observed.
conclusionsSurgical intervention for intradural spinal metastases may be considered selectively as part of a multidisciplinary palliative strategy focused on neurological function. Anatomical compartment influences surgical feasibility, intent, and achievable outcomes. IDEM lesions may allow resection with functional recovery in selected patients, whereas IM lesions generally require a conservative, function-preserving approach with clearly defined goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.