Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627511›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026

The effect of tibialis posterior tendon transfer on anatomical foot parameters and functional outcomes in drop foot patients: a single center study.

Umut Can Duvarci, Sefa Erdem Karapinar, Recep Dincer, Serdar Kamil Cepni, Yakup Barbaros Baykal, Vecihi Kirdemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Umut Can DuvarciSandıklı state hospital, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
Sefa Erdem KarapinarSuleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey. sefaerdemkarapinar@gmail.com.
Recep DincerSuleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Serdar Kamil CepniUmraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yakup Barbaros BaykalSuleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Vecihi KirdemirSuleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of tibialis posterior tendon transfer in patients with foot drop. Foot drop is characterized by weakness or loss of ankle dorsiflexion, eversion, and toe extension, commonly resulting from neurological, systemic, or traumatic causes. Tibialis posterior tendon transfer improves ankle dorsiflexion function rather than restoring normal ankle function, and it also eliminates deforming forces on the medial foot. This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of tibialis posterior tendon transfer in patients with foot drop.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent tibialis posterior tendon transfer via the interosseous membrane between 2016 and 2023. Radiological evaluation included assessment of the tibiotalar angle and hindfoot alignment. Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) was based on measurements of the calcaneus–first metatarsal angle, lateral talus–first metatarsal angle (Meary’s angle), lateral talocalcaneal angle, talohorizontal angle, calcaneal pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, anteroposterior (AP) talocalcaneal angle, and AP talus–first metatarsal angle. Surgical success and functional recovery were assessed using the Stanmore score and the criteria described by Carayon et al. The primary endpoint was the postoperative improvement in active dorsiflexion and medial longitudinal arch parameters. The Carayon criteria evaluate active dorsiflexion (DF), active plantarflexion (PF), and active range of motion (ROM). The Stanmore score assesses foot position, active DF, muscle strength grade, functional activities, ability to use normal footwear, orthosis use, and pain.

resultsThe mean age was 38.25 years (range, 22–80). The mean duration of paralysis was 45.55 months, and the mean follow-up period was 42.6 months. According to the Stanmore score, outcomes were excellent in 30% of patients, good in 30%, fair in 20%, and poor in 20%. The mean postoperative active dorsiflexion gain was 9° (SD ± 5.6). Changes in the lateral talocalcaneal, lateral talus–first metatarsal, and talohorizontal angles showed a significant relationship with the duration of paralysis, indicating a tendency toward MLA collapse; however, no patients developed pes planus or other deformities.

conclusionTibialis posterior tendon transfer effectively reduces the need for orthotic devices and achieves satisfactory restoration of active ankle dorsiflexion in patients with foot drop. Careful tension adjustment and proper positioning during surgery are essential for optimal alignment and functional recovery.

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicTendon TransferAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFoot dropFunctional outcomesInterosseous membraneRadiological parameters.Tibialis posterior tendon transfer

Identifiers

PMID41627511
PMCPMC12864352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.