ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Knowledge, training, and practice patterns in pneumatic tourniquet use among orthopedic physicians: a national cross-sectional survey.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPneumatic tourniquets are widely used in orthopedic surgery to create a bloodless operative field; however, improper use may result in skin, muscle, and nerve injuries, as well as rare but severe systemic complications. Despite their frequent use, the extent of theoretical knowledge and structured training among orthopedic surgeons remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate knowledge levels, clinical practices, complication awareness, and training needs regarding pneumatic tourniquet use among orthopedic specialists and residents in Türkiye.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey was conducted between April 1 and May 1, 2025, using an online questionnaire based on AORN 2007 pneumatic tourniquet safety guidelines. Orthopedic specialists and residents across various hospital types were invited to participate voluntarily. The questionnaire assessed demographic characteristics, training status, knowledge of safe tourniquet practices, and complication experiences. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25.0, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 300 physicians participated; 45.3% were senior specialists. Although tourniquet use was frequent (48.7% in almost every surgery), only 35.7% received both theoretical and practical training. Notably, 248 participants reported that their knowledge was gained primarily through residency experience rather than structured education. Skin injuries (41.3%), muscle weakness (37.3%), and nerve injury (30.3%) were the most common complications. Knowledge gaps were prominent, particularly regarding IVRA-related systemic toxicity (24% correct), prolonged tourniquet use complications (48.3% correct), and physiological changes after deflation (68.7% correct). Experience and training level showed limited impact on overall knowledge, except for the question regarding prolonged tourniquet duration (p = 0.01).
conclusionDespite widespread use, substantial deficiencies exist in theoretical knowledge and structured training on pneumatic tourniquet application. Reliance on experiential learning during residency appears insufficient and contributes to inconsistent practices and increased complication risk. Standardized, evidence-based training programs are urgently needed to improve safety and reduce variability in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.