ReviewRheumatology international2026
The characteristics of giant cell arteritis patients that went blind in spite of treatment: case based narrative literature review.
Review in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a medium and large vessel vasculitis. Vision loss is considered the most serious complications traditionally attributed to untreated disease. Urgent corticosteroids (CS) therapy is the standard of care and is considered adequate to prevent blindness. However, in some rare cases blindness may occur despite implementation of the appropriate treatment. We aimed to find patients who went blind despite high dose CS therapy and identify unique features of them together with conducting narrative review of previous case reports to characterize this group in search of common potential risk factors. Cases of blindness prior to treatment induction were not analyzed here. We identified 2 patients in our records who went blind despite high dose CS therapy. We found some repeated common features in patients that went blind in spite of treatment: advanced age, preexisting pronounced arteriosclerosis, thrombocytosis, contraindication to full dose CS therapy resulting in lower doses of CS within the recommended ranges. Defining the subgroup of GCA patients that went blind in spite of proper CS treatment requires further attention as they might potentially benefit from more aggressive therapy (e.g. early introduction of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.