SynthesisSurgery today2026
Persistent descending mesocolon and its impact on the short-term outcomes of minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and robotic surgery for submucosal-type metastatic rectal cancer with persistent descending mesocolon.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePersistent descending mesocolon (PDM) is a rare congenital anomaly that may complicate minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer (CRC). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the perioperative impact of PDM on MIS for CRC.
methodsThis study followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251055757). A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus (January, 2000 to April, 2025). Observational studies (OBSs) compared MIS for CRC in patients with and patients without PDM. The primary outcome was operative time and the secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, open conversion rate, complications, and vascular anatomy. Meta-analyses used a random-effects model.
resultsSeven OBSs (4,255 patients) were included in the analysis. PDM patients had significantly longer operative times (Mean difference [MD]:26.4; 95%CI:11.3-41.4) and greater intraoperative blood loss (MD:15.9; 95%CI:3.3-28.4). The rates of conversion to open surgery (Odds rate [OR]:9.6; 95%CI: 3.3-27.8) and anastomotic leakage (OR:2.49; 95%CI:1.2-5.1) were higher in PDM patients. The IMV-colon distance was significantly shorter in PDM patients, potentially increasing the marginal vessel injury risk.
conclusionPDM increases the intraoperative complexity of MIS for CRC. Thus, preoperative recognition of vascular variations is critical and such procedures should be performed at expert centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41627416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.