Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627360›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2026

Negative effects of redundant targets.

Alex L White, John Palmer, Genevieve Sanders, Jannat Hossain, Zelda B Zabinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous Cortical Responses to Multiple Written Words.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Simultaneous cortical responses to multiple written words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex L WhiteDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College, Columbia University.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-742X
John PalmerDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-4631
Genevieve SandersDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College, Columbia University.
Jannat HossainDepartment of Neuroscience and Behavior, Barnard College, Columbia University.
Zelda B ZabinskyDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Washington.

Funding

Capacity limits in the neural circuitry of visual word recognitionR00EY029366 · NEI · BARNARD COLLEGE · PI WHITE, ALEXANDER LINDLEY · 2021 to 2023
$746k
NEI NIH HHSNEI NIH HHS R00 EY029366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual system can encode many stimuli simultaneously, but there are limits to how well multiple objects can be identified in parallel. At the extreme, some objects might have to be identified serially. The redundant target paradigm is one tool for distinguishing specific parallel and serial models. It compares responses to displays containing one target versus displays containing two targets. The typical result is a positive redundant target effect: faster correct responses to two targets, as predicted by many parallel models. Here, we generalize three standard models to account for response accuracy as well as speed. Surprisingly, two models predict a reversal of the redundant target effect (slower responses to two targets than to one target): the generalized standard serial model and a specific form of a fixed-capacity parallel model. To test that prediction, we measured performance for three different judgments of written words: color detection, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. The color task yielded positive redundant target effects, which reject the standard serial model. The semantic task yielded consistently negative effects, which are consistent with either the standard serial model or some limited-capacity parallel models. Thus, redundant targets can have negative effects, and they demonstrate limits that impair simultaneous recognition of two words. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Color PerceptionModels, PsychologicalPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41627360
PMCPMC12866944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.