Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627136›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2026

Cis or trans: a puzzle of Parkin activation mechanism.

Mohini Sherawat, Ankit Kumar, Dipti Ranjan Lenka, Atul Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohini SherawatDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Bhopal, Bhopal, 462066, India.
Ankit KumarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Bhopal, Bhopal, 462066, India.
Dipti Ranjan LenkaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Bhopal, Bhopal, 462066, India.
Atul KumarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Bhopal, Bhopal, 462066, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4675-6623

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PARK2 gene, which encodes the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin, and the PARK6 gene, encoding phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced kinase 1 (PINK1), are frequently mutated in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Parkin is normally maintained in an autoinhibited conformation, and its activation is triggered by PINK1-mediated phosphorylation of both ubiquitin or NEDD8 and Parkin's ubiquitin-like (Ubl) domain. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the models proposed over the past decade to explain Parkin's autoinhibition and activation. We summarize key structural and biophysical studies that have progressively uncovered the molecular basis of Parkin activation, tracing the evolution of these insights. This review concludes by discussing the intriguing and still unresolved question of whether Parkin activation occurs through a cis or trans mechanism and outlines future directions for research aimed at understanding these pathways.

Indexed as

Ubiquitin-Protein LigasesAnimalsEnzyme ActivationHumansParkinson DiseasePhosphorylationProtein KinasesPTEN-Induced Putative Kinaseparkin proteinProtein KinasesPTEN-Induced Putative KinaseUbiquitin-Protein LigasesmitophagyParkinParkinson’sPINK1ubiquitin

Identifiers

PMID41627136
PMCPMC12954527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.