Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41627135›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2026

Implementing a complex innovation into workplace operations: The case of work ability support for indoor environment-associated health complaints.

Hanna Keränen, Aki Vuokko, Pirjo Korenius, Sanna Selinheimo, Pirjo Juvonen-Posti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanna KeränenWork Ability and Working Careers, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-1706
Aki VuokkoOccupational Health, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0004-8057-3235
Pirjo KoreniusOccupational Health, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Kuopio, Finland.
Sanna SelinheimoOccupational Health, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0563-9017
Pirjo Juvonen-PostiWork Ability and Working Careers, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundMultifactorial health complaints associated with indoor work environments can impact on employees' work ability and arouse controversies in the workplace. Traditionally, solutions have centered on building-related factors, however supporting work ability requires a multi-perspective approach.ObjectiveThis study explored relevant perspectives for implementing a multi-perspective work ability support model. This model represents a complex intervention within the intricate context of indoor environment-related health complaints in the workplace.MethodsWe used recordings and notes from the workshops of a project aiming to implement the work ability support model in three organizations and used reflexive thematic analysis. We developed overarching themes from the data, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an interpretative lens to structure the findings into implementation perspectives.ResultsWe developed four overarching themes encompassing all CFIR domains and most constructs: (1) the acknowledgment and validation of employees' emotions and experiences as a solution, (2) reliable information and detailed facts as the key to managing work ability support, (3) existing tools as a means to normalization and collaboration, and (4) supervisors as central actors in a challenging task.ConclusionsImplementing a work ability support model regarding complex phenomena affecting work ability, such as indoor environment-related health complaints, requires identifying and addressing the potential tensions and controversies underlying the model and requires consideration of the context. Viewing communication as a process of developing shared understanding and co-constructing knowledge throughout the implementation process and all its dimensions can be beneficial for the implementation.

Indexed as

Work Capacity EvaluationWorkplaceHumansOccupational HealthQualitative ResearchWorking Conditionsimplementation scienceindoor air pollutionoccupational healthpreventive health servicesworking conditionsworkplace

Identifiers

PMID41627135
PMCPMC13219775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.