Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626979›Full record

ReviewResearch synthesis methods2025

Meta-analyzing correlation matrices in the presence of hierarchical effect size multiplicity.

Ronny Scherer, Diego G Campos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research synthesis methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ronny SchererCentre for Educational Measurement (CEMO), Faculty of Educational Sciences, https://ror.org/01xtthb56University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-0710
Diego G CamposCentre for Educational Measurement (CEMO), Faculty of Educational Sciences, https://ror.org/01xtthb56University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-5881

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme 101132474Norges Forskningsråd 331640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To synthesize evidence on the relations among multiple constructs, measures, or concepts, meta-analyzing correlation matrices across primary studies has become a crucial analytic approach. Common meta-analytic approaches employ univariate or multivariate models to estimate a pooled correlation matrix, which is subjected to further analyses, such as structural equation modeling. In practice, meta-analysts often extract multiple correlation matrices per study from various samples, study sites, labs, or countries, thus introducing hierarchical effect size multiplicity into the meta-analytic data. However, this feature has largely been ignored when pooling correlation matrices for meta-analysis. To contribute to the methodological development in this area, we describe a multilevel, multivariate, and random-effects modeling approach, which pools correlation matrices meta-analytically and, at the same time, addresses hierarchical effect size multiplicity. Specifically, it allows meta-analysts to test various assumptions on the dependencies among random effects, aiding the selection of a meta-analytic baseline model. We describe this approach, present four working models within it, and illustrate them with an example and the corresponding R code.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicAlgorithmsComputer SimulationCorrelation of DataData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisResearch DesignSoftwarecorrelation matrixeffect size multiplicitymeta-analytic structural equation modelingmultilevel meta-analysismultivariate meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41626979
PMCPMC12657669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.