Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626966›Full record

ReviewResearch synthesis methods2025

CausalMetaR: An R package for performing causally interpretable meta-analyses.

Guanbo Wang, Sean McGrath, Yi Lian

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research synthesis methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guanbo WangCAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sean McGrathDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7281-3516
Yi LianDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

National Science FoundationPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers would often like to leverage data from a collection of sources (e.g., meta-analyses of randomized trials, multi-center trials, pooled analyses of observational cohorts) to estimate causal effects in a target population of interest. However, because different data sources typically represent different underlying populations, traditional meta-analytic methods may not produce causally interpretable estimates that apply to any reasonable target population. In this article, we present the CausalMetaR R package, which implements robust and efficient methods to estimate causal effects in a given internal or external target population using multi-source data. The package includes estimators of average and subgroup treatment effects for the entire target population. To produce efficient and robust estimates of causal effects, the package implements doubly robust and non-parametric efficient estimators and supports using flexible data-adaptive (e.g., machine learning techniques) methods and cross-fitting techniques to estimate the nuisance models (e.g., the treatment model, the outcome model). We briefly review the methods, describe the key features of the package, and demonstrate how to use the package through an example. The package aims to facilitate causal analyses in the context of meta-analysis.

Indexed as

CausalityMeta-Analysis as TopicSoftwareAlgorithmsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMachine LearningModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTreatment Effect Heterogeneitycausal inferenceCausalMetaRheterogeneous treatment effectsmeta-analysisR packagetransportability

Identifiers

PMID41626966
PMCPMC12527535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.