Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626960›Full record

ArticleResearch synthesis methods2025

Subgroup identification using individual participant data from multiple trials: An application in low back pain.

Cynthia Huber, Tim Friede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research synthesis methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cynthia HuberDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Model-based recursive partitioning (MOB) and its extension, metaMOB, are tools for identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects. When pooling data from various trials the metaMOB approach uses random effects to model the heterogeneity of treatment effects. In situations where interventions offer only small overall benefits and require extensive, costly trials with a large participant enrollment, leveraging individual-participant data (IPD) from multiple trials can help identify individuals who are most likely to benefit from the intervention. We explore the application of MOB and metaMOB in the context of non-specific low back pain treatment, using synthetic data based on a subset of the individual participant data meta-analysis by Patel et al.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicLow Back PainAlgorithmsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, StatisticalResearch DesignTreatment Effect HeterogeneityTreatment OutcomeGLMM-treeheterogeneityindividual-participant data (IPD)meta-analysismetaMOBmodel-based recursive partitioning (MOB)subgroup identification

Identifiers

PMID41626960
PMCPMC12527538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.