Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626915›Full record

ArticleResearch synthesis methods2025

Exploring graphical approaches to assess the impact of an additional trial on a decision model via updated meta-analysis.

Will Robinson, Alex Sutton, Clareece Nevill, Nicola Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research synthesis methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Will RobinsonBiostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, https://ror.org/04h699437University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Alex SuttonBiostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, https://ror.org/04h699437University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Clareece NevillBiostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, https://ror.org/04h699437University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Nicola CooperBiostatistics Research Group, Department of Population Health Sciences, https://ror.org/04h699437University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research F-112439NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre F-112438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphical displays are often utilised for high-quality reporting of meta-analyses. Previous work has presented augmentations to funnel plots that assess the impact that an additional trial would have on an existing meta-analysis. However, decision-makers, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the United Kingdom, assess health technologies based on their cost-effectiveness, as opposed to efficacy alone. Motivated by this fact, this article outlines a novel approach, developed for augmenting funnel plots, based on the ability of an additional trial to change a decision regarding the optimal intervention. The approach is presented for a generalised class of economic decision models, where the clinical effectiveness of the health technology of interest is informed by a meta-analysis, and is illustrated with an example application. The 'decision contours' produced from the proposed methods have various potential uses not only for decision-makers and research funders but also for other researchers, such as meta-analysts and primary researchers designing new studies, as well as those developing health technologies, such as pharmaceutical companies. The relationship between the new approach and existing methods for determining sample size calculations for future trials is also considered.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDecision Support TechniquesMeta-Analysis as TopicAlgorithmsBiomedical TechnologyComputer GraphicsCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDecision MakingEvidence-Based MedicineHumansModels, EconomicResearch DesignSample SizeTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalUnited Kingdomeconomic decision modellingevidence-based researchfunnel plotmeta-analysisstatistical methodologystudy design

Identifiers

PMID41626915
PMCPMC12527514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.