Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626765›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2026

The role and utility of artificial intelligence and machine learning for diagnostic prediction in general practice.

Liesbeth Hunik, Annemarie A Uijen, Jacqueline K Kueper, Amanda L Terry, Tim C Olde Hartman, Twan van Laarhoven, Henk J Schers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liesbeth HunikDepartment of Primary and Community care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4791-8823
Annemarie A UijenDepartment of Primary and Community care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7703-6250
Jacqueline K KueperScripps Research Translational Institute, Scripps Research, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-1552
Amanda L TerryCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8157-8298
Tim C Olde HartmanDepartment of Primary and Community care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-1206
Twan van LaarhovenInstitute for Computing and Information Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7597-0579
Henk J SchersDepartment of Primary and Community care, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9362-9451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic prediction models are commonly used in general practice to support clinical decision-making. Traditionally, these models have been developed using statistical methods such as logistic regression. While these approaches have proven useful, they often produce average risk estimates that may not fully account for the complexity of individual patients. In recent years, the use of machine learning (ML), a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI), has grown in healthcare. We examine the similarities and differences between traditional statistical methods and AI/ML approaches for diagnostic prediction in general practice. Using examples from daily practice, we explore how ML techniques can add value, particularly in handling large, complex datasets such as those derived from electronic health records. We also discuss key challenges that hinder the adoption of AI/ML in general practice, including interpretability, data quality, external validation, clinical relevance, implementation and legal issues, and practical usability. We provide recommendations to overcome these challenges. The potential of AI/ML can only be realised if tools are developed collaboratively with GPs, focused on real-world clinical problems, and rigorously validated in practice settings. GP associations, GPs, patients, and primary care scientists should take an active role in the development, validation, and implementation of AI/ML-based diagnostic prediction tools for general practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGeneral PracticeMachine LearningClinical Decision-MakingElectronic Health RecordsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsArtificial intelligencedecision supportdiagnostic predictiongeneral practicemachine learningprimary caretraditional statistics

Identifiers

PMID41626765
PMCPMC12865821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.