ArticleTree physiology2026
Drought response of fire-adapted Mediterranean shrubs under elevated CO2.
Article in Tree physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first summer after fire poses a high risk of drought mortality for species that rely on postfire recruitment for their persistence in fire-prone ecosystems (postfire seeders). However, little is known about how future conditions of elevated atmospheric CO2 (eCO2) and its interaction with severe drought will affect this key life history strategy in Mediterranean shrublands. We investigated the extent to which eCO2 modifies plant traits and resource allocation, as well as how eCO2 and drought intensity interact to modify plant water status, water fluxes and hydraulic behavior in 8-month-old seedlings of five seeder shrub species. Among the studied species, three regenerate postfire exclusively by seed (non-resprouting seeders), while two can also resprout after fire (resprouting seeders). We found that eCO₂ significantly reduced specific leaf area for all species and increased above- and belowground biomass for three species but had no species-specific effects on stomatal density or root-to-shoot ratios. When species were grouped by resprouting ability, eCO2 reduced root-to-shoot ratios in resprouting species but not in non-resprouting species. Importantly, eCO2 did not affect plant water relations under drought either at the species level or when grouped by resprouting ability. However, resprouting and non-resprouting seeders exhibited distinct water-use strategies under drought, independent of CO₂ treatment. Overall, eCO₂ is unlikely to mitigate drought stress for postfire seeders in future climates. Considering functional differences across life history strategies, as well as the variability of traits within them, is key to predicting future patterns of biodiversity in a drier and more fire-prone world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.