ArticleThe Journal of heredity2026
Genomic erosion in the assessment of species' extinction risk and recovery potential.
Article in The Journal of heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mid-Atlantic Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) genome to advance conservation and comparative genomics.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Harnessing macrogenomics to study changing marine ecosystems under global climate change.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Historical and contemporary butterfly genomes reveal genetic erosion in response to land-use intensification.iScience · 2026Article
- Population Decline, Inbreeding and Hybridization Shape the Genetic Vulnerability of a Critically Endangered Seabird.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Multi-Locus Nuclear Marker Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Swiss Orthoptera Unveils Conservation Status Limitations.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Article
- Challenges of Introgression in Conservation: Genetic Diversity of the Endangered Wild Camel (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic erosion across avian lineages in the context of their evolutionary history.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Highly contiguous reference genome assembly of the endangered Orcés' blue whiptail Holcosus orcesi.PloS one · 2026Article
- Genomic Signatures in Maned Three-Toed Sloths From Ancient to Recent Environmental Changes in Brazil's Threatened Atlantic Forest.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Genomic Signatures and Demographic History of the Widespread and Critically Endangered Yellow-Breasted Bunting.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Persistent Genomic Erosion in Whooping Cranes Despite Demographic Recovery.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Conservation Arks: Genomic Erosion and Inbreeding in an Abundant Island Population of Koalas.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Chromosome-level genome of the European hamster (Cricetus cricetus) and its genome-wide population structure across Western Europe.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Temporal Loss of Genome-Wide and Immunogenetic Diversity in a Near-Extinct Parrot.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Time-lagged genomic erosion and future environmental risks in a bird on the brink of extinction.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Haplotype-resolved reference genomes of the sea turtle clade unveil ultra-syntenic genomes with hotspots of divergence.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Whole Genomes Inform Genetic Rescue Strategy for Montane Red Foxes in North America.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Genomic Diversity as a Key Conservation Criterion: Proof-of-Concept From Mammalian Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many species are undergoing rapid population declines and environmental deterioration, leading to genomic erosion. Here we define genomic erosion as the loss of genetic diversity, accumulation of deleterious mutations, maladaptation, and introgression, all of which can undermine individual fitness and long-term population viability. Critically, this process continues even after demographic recovery due to a time-lagged impact of genetic drift, which is known as drift debt. Current conservation assessments, such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, focus on short-term extinction risk and do not capture the long-term consequences of genomic erosion. Likewise, the longer-term assessments of the International Union for Conservation of Nature Green Status may overestimate population recovery by failing to account for the enduring effects of genomic erosion. As genome sequencing becomes increasingly accessible, there is a growing opportunity to quantify genomic erosion and integrate it into conservation planning. Here, we use genomic simulations to illustrate how different genomic metrics are sensitive to the drift debt. We test how ancestral effective population size (Ne) and bottleneck history influence the tempo and severity of genomic erosion. Furthermore, we demonstrate how these dynamics shape genetic load and additive genetic variation, which are key indicators of long-term evolutionary potential. Finally, we present a proof-of-concept for a Genomic Green Status framework that aligns genomic metrics with conservation impact assessments, laying the foundation for genomics-informed strategies to support species recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.