ArticleBMJ public health2026
Contraceptive choices in Karachi: a phenomenological analysis of women's perspectives on the quality of family planning services in low-income urban areas.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Family planning (FP) services are essential for reproductive health and women's empowerment, yet quality gaps persist in low-income urban areas of Pakistan. This study explores women's perspectives on FP service quality in the underserved communities of Malir Town, Karachi. Methods: Using a phenomenological qualitative design, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with current and past users of modern contraceptives from three Union Councils: Saudabad, Khokhrapar and Kala Board. Data were collected through 12 in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions (n=25 participants). Data were analysed thematically using Judith Bruce's 'Quality of Care' framework. Results: Participants reported inadequate contraceptive options, poor counselling, lack of follow-up and limited decision-making autonomy. Respectful provider interactions, clear communication and community health worker support were identified as key facilitators. Structural issues, such as fragmented service delivery and poor integration, hindered consistent contraceptive use. Conclusion: Improving FP service quality in poor urban settings requires a client-centred approach that strengthens counselling, ensures method availability, integrates services and leverages community-based support. Further research should include non-users to inform scalable, equity-focused interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.