ArticleBMJ public health2026
Roles of children, isolation measures and socioeconomic status in SARS-CoV-2 household transmission: a retrospective cohort study in a southern US city.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: There has been significant debate about both the role of children in SARS-CoV-2 community transmission as well as the potential harm or lack thereof of the virus in the paediatric population. We aimed to better understand how children are impacted by a SARS-CoV-2 household infection and to identify behavioural and social factors related to infection. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on households with children and a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection in Atlanta, GA. Participants were enrolled from December 2020 through November 2021. Salivary IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid antigens was measured and household and infection data collected and analysed. Results: 49 households participated, including 121 adults and 57 children with 118 (66%) individuals having been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Mean SARS-CoV-2 secondary infection rate was 0.55 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.69) and median, 0.67 (range 0-1.0). Incidence rate did not differ significantly between households with paediatric versus adult index cases (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.49). However, sharing a bedroom or bathroom was associated with a higher incidence of secondary infection (IRR 2.36, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.74). Neighbourhood deprivation index was associated with higher household SARS-CoV-2 incidence, but this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Child index cases appeared as likely to result in household secondary SARS-CoV-2 infections as adult index cases, while sharing rooms was associated with higher incidence of infection. This study highlights the importance of isolation measures to prevent household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 as well as counters common thought that children are less likely to transmit infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.