Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626581›Full record

ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026

A coupled disease-misinformation model of measles transmission in the Canadian context.

Callandra Moore, David Fisman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Callandra MooreUniversity of Toronto at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Canada.
David FismanUniversity of Toronto at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious disease dynamics are increasingly shaped not only by biological processes but also by the spread of misinformation. This study presents a coupled disease-misinformation model, SMIRK, to evaluate the impact of misinformation on a recent measles outbreak in Canada. The novel model combines a standard SIR framework for measles transmission with an SIS-like KMK model for misinformation spread. Two misinformation recovery paradigms are explored: constant-rate recovery and recovery induced by contact with infected individuals. Parameters were estimated using least-squares fitting to epidemiological data from Health Canada and Public Health Ontario (December 2024 to March 2025). Model calibration suggests that misinformation rapidly reaches a stable equilibrium, effectively saturating the population regardless of recovery paradigm. Due to the rapid information homogenization of the population, measles is predicted to behave as a standard low-

Identifiers

PMID41626581
PMCPMC12857326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.