Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626576›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Artificial intelligence and precision medicine: a pilot study predicting optimal ceftaroline dosage for pediatric patients.

Maria Frasca, Gianluca Gazzaniga, Agnese Graziosi, Valentina De Nicolo, Costantino De Giacomo, Stefano Martinelli, Michele Senatore, Alessandra Romandini, Chiara Moretti, Giulia Angela Carla Pattarino and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Maria Frasca *Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca Gazzaniga *Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialty Paride Stefanini, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Agnese Graziosi *Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Valentina De NicoloDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Costantino De GiacomoPediatric Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Stefano MartinelliNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Michele SenatoreChemical-Clinical Analyses Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra RomandiniChemical-Clinical Analyses Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Chiara MorettiPediatric Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Giulia Angela Carla PattarinoPediatric Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Alice ProtoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Romano DanesiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesco ScaglioneDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca VagoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Davide La TorreDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Arianna PaniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate drug dosing in pediatrics is complicated by age-related physiological variability. Standard weight-based dosing may result in either subtherapeutic exposure or toxicity. Machine learning (ML) models can capture complex relationships among clinical variables and support individualized therapy. Methods: We analyzed clinical and pharmacokinetic data from 20 pediatric patients enrolled in the PUERI study (January 2020-November 2021, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy). Eight ML models-including linear regression (LR), ridge regression (RR), lasso regression (LaR), Huber regression (HR), random forest (RF), XGBoost, LightGBM, and a neural network (MLP)-were trained to predict ceftaroline doses that would achieve plasma concentrations close to the therapeutic target of 10 mg/L. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R Results: MLP (MAE 1.53 mg, R Conclusion: Advanced ML models can optimize ceftaroline dosing in pediatric patients and outperform traditional dosing strategies. Combining predictive accuracy with interpretability (via LIME) supports clinical trust and may enhance precision antibiotic therapy while reducing the risks of antimicrobial resistance and toxicity.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceceftarolinedrug dosingexplainable AImachine learningpediatric pharmacokineticspersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID41626576
PMCPMC12856755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.