ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Population receptive field size does not correspond to spatial frequency processing in scene-selective cortex.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans are experts at scene perception, for example, for recognizing familiar places or navigating new spaces. Scene representations in the brain are often thought of as global or large-scale, suggesting that scenes are represented by coarse-grained or holistic features. Recent work has shown that high spatial frequency or fine-grained visual information is also represented within scene-selective areas, which challenges the idea of strictly low-frequency, gist-like representations in those regions. Here, we explore whether these contrasting views can be explained by the size of the population receptive fields (pRFs) within two scene-selective areas: the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and occipital place area (OPA). Our results show that both the PPA and the OPA contain voxels with a variety of receptive field sizes, which follow a gradient from large to small along the anterior-posterior axis. This organization would predict scene representations in anterior PPA/OPA to be dominated by low spatial frequencies and scene representations in posterior PPA/OPA by high spatial frequencies. We find the opposite pattern when decoding scene categories of spatial frequency-filtered images. Our results indicate that preferred scene feature representations are transformed along the visual hierarchy, adhering closely to the expected correspondence between spatial frequency preferences and pRF size in early visual areas, but demonstrably less so in high-level visual brain regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.