ArticleNew microbes and new infections2026
Optimizing health care delivery by adapting diagnostics in a low-resource setting: The case of San Miguel Hospital, Sucumbíos, Ecuador.
Article in New microbes and new infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To strategically optimize diagnostic capacity in a low-resource, rural hospital setting, we developed a systematic evaluation of diagnostic tool needs and associated costs. This local data-driven method, accounting for patient characteristics and disease prevalence, can be adapted to other contexts. Methods: A retrospective patient record analysis was conducted at San Miguel Hospital (SMH) in Sucumbíos, Ecuador, which provides outpatient and emergency care to inhabitants of the Ecuadorian and Colombian Amazon basin. Ethics approval was granted retrospectively by the Research Ethics Committee on Human Beings of the Universidad San Francisco de Quito.Data was retrieved from electronic medical records (EMRs) of the first 796 patients seen after hospital opening. For each of the 1975 diagnoses made, patient characteristics and the presence or absence of appropriate diagnostic tools were recorded. Unavailable tools were further evaluated for accessibility within the local context. Results: Serving a population primarily of mixed and indigenous ethnicities, SMH confirmed 66 % of diagnoses using existing resources, with potassium hydroxide (KOH) fungal microscopy, chikungunya and influenza rapid tests, and access to anatomical pathology identified as the diagnostic tools offering the highest return on investment. Conclusions: Data from SMH's EMRs suggest which diagnostic tools would offer the greatest return on investment through increased diagnostic confirmation. This evaluation tool supports improved health care delivery at SMH and, with adaptation, can be applied in comparable health care settings. Trial registration: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.