ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
SpArking change for patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis in the UK: results from a UK Delphi consensus study.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To establish a UK-specific consensus on improving standards of care for patients with PsA and axial SpA through patient empowerment, education, access and optimal treatment approaches. Methods: A modified Delphi methodology was employed. A steering group of UK rheumatologists and pharmacists developed 56 consensus statements across four domains: patient empowerment, patient and healthcare professional (HCP) knowledge, access to healthcare and treatment principles. These statements were tested with a panel of 100 UK rheumatologists using a 4-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined as ≥75% agreement. Results: Consensus was achieved for 98% (55/56) of statements; 93% (52/56) reached strong consensus (≥90%). Statements supported embedding patient empowerment tools (e.g. patient-reported outcome measures, patient activation measures), implementing patient-initiated follow-up and ensuring shared decision-making. Respondents strongly endorsed multidisciplinary care, tailored educational resources, psychological support and timely access to physiotherapy and biologics. Treatment decisions should prioritise clinical need and patient goals rather than cost alone. Conclusion: This UK Delphi consensus highlights expert agreement that best practice care for PsA and axial SpA should centre on patient empowerment, supported by multidisciplinary teams, education and equitable access to treatments. Implementing personalised, holistic care models has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare burden. Further research should validate these recommendations with patients and explore strategies for their integration into National Health Service practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.