Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626486›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Sawdust-Assisted Phytoremediation: Boosting White Mustard (

Dawid J Kramski, Jolanta Warchoł, Izabela Michalak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dawid J KramskiDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Smoluchowskiego 25, 50-372 Wrocław, Poland.
Jolanta WarchołDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Smoluchowskiego 25, 50-372 Wrocław, Poland.
Izabela MichalakDepartment of Advanced Material Technologies, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Smoluchowskiego 25, 50-372 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8084-9642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metal-contaminated soils are a common problem that negatively affect the entire trophic chain. Therefore, solutions are needed that remove heavy metals from the soil, or allow their immobilization in the soil, limiting availability to plants. This research verified whether sawdust added to soil, contaminated with heavy metal ions, supports phytoremediation (bioaccumulation of metals in the plant) or sorbs heavy metals in the soil (immobilization), thus limiting their availability to plants. In batch equilibrium studies, spruce, pine, and oak sawdust were characterized for their physicochemical and biosorption properties, demonstrating varying capacities for the removal of heavy metal ions (Cd-(II), Cr-(III), Cu-(II), Zn-(II)), primarily through surface complexation and ion-exchange related to functional groups (e.g., amino, carboxyl, and phenolic). Among the metal ions tested, the most effective sorption by sawdust occurred in the case of Cd-(II) ions. The bath equilibrium study was supported by modeling calculations and biosorbent analysis using ICP-OES, XRF, FTIR, and SEM-EDS techniques. However, in pot tests using Cd-contaminated soil, the addition of all types of sawdust did not significantly limit the bioaccumulation of cadmium in the above-ground biomass of white mustard (

Identifiers

PMID41626486
PMCPMC12854522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.