Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626467›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Quantitative Elemental Oxides Analysis of Rock Cuttings Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Coupled with Bayesian Optimization and Support Vector Machine.

Sara Abu Alsaud, Aaron Swanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara Abu AlsaudEXPEC Advanced Research Center, Saudi Aramco, Dhahran 34466, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-3610
Aaron SwansonDiversified Well Logging, LLC, Conroe, Texas 77303, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast elemental analysis in the wellsite is crucial across the energy sector, where timely and accurate geological information drives operational efficiency and safety. In geothermal projects, rapid geochemical characterization aids in identifying reservoir quality and alteration zones, optimizing drilling locations, and reducing nonproductive time. For carbon storage, a quick assessment of rock mineralogy ensures suitable cap rock integrity, which is essential for environmental safety. In hydrocarbon exploration and production, immediate elemental data enable real-time lithology evaluation, improving well placement, reducing drilling risks, and lowering operational costs. Overall, integrating advanced machine learning with portable, on-site Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) technology provides fast, reliable elemental data that support adaptive and cost-effective resource development in these critical operations. In retrospect, this paper explores and evaluates the application and coupling of the Bayesian optimization process for hyperparameter tuning with support vector machine, with the objective of quantifying major oxide elements present in rock cuttings samples from LIBS. The main objective of using this process is to automatically optimize the model performance while minimizing the manual iterative and random trial and testing of the hyperparameters. In this investigation, over 1000 samples were prepared to develop the predictive model, where X-ray fluorescence was used as the reference method for obtaining concentration. The model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, achieving an

Identifiers

PMID41626467
PMCPMC12854599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.