Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626428›Full record

ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026

Pain determinants during office hysteroscopy: Insights from clinical and procedural factors: A nine-year prospective cohort study.

Wassan Nori, Zeena R Helmi, Rafal M Murshid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wassan NoriCollege of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Zeena R HelmiCollege of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Rafal M MurshidCollege of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hysteroscopy is regarded as the gold standard for current gynecological assessment. Many patients tolerate hysteroscopy without anesthesia but a small proportion experience significant pain that leads to procedure discontinuation. Thus, our aim was to identify patients and procedure-related parameters that contribute to severe pain perception. We developed a predictive model to discriminate between candidates at risk for severe pain to enhance patient acceptance, comfort, and hysteroscopic outcome. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 788 cases referred to a hysteroscopic clinic for diverse causes. For each patient, we recorded demographic, reproductive, and procedure-related variables, including pain assessed by using a visual analog scale. Results: Severe pain was reported in 10.4 % ( Conclusion: High probabilities of pain perception were reported among patients with a history of dilatation and curettage, primary infertility, endometrial biopsy, cervical stenosis, and ostia abnormality. Those populations are considered to be at heightened risk of severe pain perception during hysteroscopy. Discriminating those groups can facilitate pre-procedure counseling and alternative pain therapy may be offered to improve the standard of care and overall hysteroscopic results.

Indexed as

Dilatation and curettageHysteroscopyPain perceptionPatient tolerancePrimary infertilityVisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID41626428
PMCPMC12854036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.