ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026
Pain determinants during office hysteroscopy: Insights from clinical and procedural factors: A nine-year prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hysteroscopy is regarded as the gold standard for current gynecological assessment. Many patients tolerate hysteroscopy without anesthesia but a small proportion experience significant pain that leads to procedure discontinuation. Thus, our aim was to identify patients and procedure-related parameters that contribute to severe pain perception. We developed a predictive model to discriminate between candidates at risk for severe pain to enhance patient acceptance, comfort, and hysteroscopic outcome. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 788 cases referred to a hysteroscopic clinic for diverse causes. For each patient, we recorded demographic, reproductive, and procedure-related variables, including pain assessed by using a visual analog scale. Results: Severe pain was reported in 10.4 % ( Conclusion: High probabilities of pain perception were reported among patients with a history of dilatation and curettage, primary infertility, endometrial biopsy, cervical stenosis, and ostia abnormality. Those populations are considered to be at heightened risk of severe pain perception during hysteroscopy. Discriminating those groups can facilitate pre-procedure counseling and alternative pain therapy may be offered to improve the standard of care and overall hysteroscopic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.