ArticleOphthalmology science2026
ReticularNet: Automated Pixel-Level Segmentation of Reticular Pseudodrusen on Near-Infrared Reflectance Images by Deep Learning.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) represent an important biomarker in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) but are difficult to grade and often assessed only for presence or absence, without quantitative or spatial analysis of RPD burden. The objective was to develop and validate a deep learning model for pixel-level RPD grading on near-infrared reflectance (NIR) images, which are commonly acquired in clinical practice and the most accurate en face detection modality. Design: Deep learning model development study. Participants: Five hundred eight images of 117 eyes (70 participants) with or without RPD, over a wide range of AMD severities. Methods: The ground truth grading pipeline comprised reading center multimodal grading for RPD presence and NIR annotation with RPD contours, followed by pixel-level NIR annotation of all individual RPD lesions. The data set was split 80:20 into training and test sets. A DeepLabv3-ResNet-18 segmentation deep learning model ("ReticularNet") was trained to perform pixel-level grading of RPD on NIR images. Its performance was compared with that of 4 ophthalmologists. Main Outcome Measures: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for RPD lesion number, pixel area, and contour area. Results: For pixel-level grading, ReticularNet achieved a mean DSC of 0.36 (standard deviation 0.16). This was significantly higher than the mean DSC of each ophthalmologist (0.03, 0.13, 0.19, and 0.23; Conclusions: ReticularNet achieved automated pixel-level grading of RPD on NIR images. Its grading was superior to that of 4 ophthalmologists, across a variety of metrics. We are making the code/models available for research use. Improved access to quantitative and spatial RPD grading should lead to improved understanding of these lesions as important biomarkers of retinal disease. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.