Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626418›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025

Pain management for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Najla Tabbara, Anna Taddio, Elizabeth Uleryk, Vibhuti Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Najla TabbaraDepartment of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8370-0381
Anna TaddioLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-8975
Elizabeth UlerykE.M. Uleryk Consulting, Mississauga, Ontario.
Vibhuti ShahInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is a clinically essential but painful procedure commonly performed in neonates. Early exposure to pain is associated with negative sequelae and therefore pain should be managed. Various non-pharmacological and/or pharmacological interventions have been used in clinical practice. However, the optimal pain management strategy is unclear. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the benefits and harms of pain management interventions in neonates undergoing PICC placement. Methods: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to March 2024. The literature search was updated in June 2025 and no additional eligible articles were identified for inclusion. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. The critically important outcome was pain measured using validated tools including unidimensional behaviour and multidimensional (comprising combinations of contextual, behavioural and/or physiological components) tools. Secondary outcomes included procedure success and adverse events. Pooled effect estimates were standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effects models. A GRADE assessment of the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome was completed. Results: Six included studies reported pain scores for between-group comparisons of pain management interventions among 324 neonates. The interventions included intravenous opioids (morphine, remifentanil), topical anesthetics (tetracaine) and intravenous acetaminophen. Morphine was effective in reducing acute pain compared to control (SMD -0.65 [95% CI -1.17, -0.13]) using a unidimensional tool (brow bulge) in one study. Using two different multidimensional tools, remifentanil was effective in reducing acute pain compared to control (SMD -1.59 [95% CI -2.21, -0.97] using the premature infant pain profile [PIPP] and SMD -1.21 [95% CI -1.79, -0.62] using the neonatal infant pain scale). In a meta-analysis of two RCTs comparing tetracaine to placebo, there was no difference in acute pain (SMD -0.05 [95% CI -1.70, 1.59], I Discussion: Based on available evidence, opioids probably reduce pain associated with PICC placement in neonates. Topical anesthetics and acetaminophen were not demonstrated to be effective. Further research is necessary to guide healthcare professionals in implementing optimal pain management for this procedure.

Indexed as

InfantNewbornPain managementPain measurementPICC placement

Identifiers

PMID41626418
PMCPMC12856207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.