Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626396›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Reliability of a gamified tablet-based tapping digital test for assessing motor coordination in adults.

Yasmim Fernandes Moniz, Luis Duarte Andrade Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yasmim Fernandes MonizNEUROREHABLAB, ARDITI - Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação, Funchal, Portugal.
Luis Duarte Andrade FerreiraNEUROREHABLAB, ARDITI - Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação, Funchal, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor coordination can be defined as the ability to perform motor tasks efficiently and in the shortest possible time. This skill is essential in daily life, as many tasks require a certain level of coordination. Assessing motor coordination is crucial, particularly in motor rehabilitation, making the availability of accessible and effective tools to measure this variable essential for clinical practice. The objective of this study was to verify the reliability of a new gamified motor coordination test (Tapping Digital Test on a tablet interface) and to investigate the correlation of this test with traditional assessment methods, including the Tapping Test, Box and Blocks Test, and Nine Hole Peg Test. A total of 45 healthy adults were recruited to participate, performing all motor coordination tests across two assessments with a 1-week interval between them. The results showed good intra-rater reliability (ICC of 0.80 for the right hand,

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceVideo GamesAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultassessmentbox and blocksmotor coordinationreliabilitytablettest

Identifiers

PMID41626396
PMCPMC12852344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.