ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
The evolution and future trajectory of public hospital reforms with a public-welfare orientation in China.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biases and corrections in total factor productivity evaluation in Chinese public hospitals: an opinion under the policy lens of new quality productive forces.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a cornerstone of the healthcare system, public hospital reforms in China represent a complex and critical endeavor, shaped by the nation's evolving socioeconomic landscape. This paper employs a methodological framework of historical and policy analysis to examine the evolution of public hospital reforms in China. It traces the trajectory of these reforms against the backdrop of the country's socioeconomic development across different periods and identifies four distinct stages: (1) the government-led system foundation stage (1949-1978), (2) the market-oriented phase marked by a gradual weakening of public-welfare nature (1979-2004), (3) the period of reflection and readjustment toward restoring public-welfare orientation (2005-2020), (4) the ongoing stage of deepening reform centered on reinforcing public-welfare nature (2021-present). A key contribution of this study lies in its integration of historical and policy perspectives, addressing a significant gap in the comparative literature on health system reforms. The analysis concludes that upholding public-welfare nature as the core principle is essential for evaluating the success of future reforms. To address existing policy barriers, the study proposes establishing a collaborative governance mechanism and strengthening the "tripartite linkage" among medical services, health insurance, and pharmaceuticals, coupled with a reconstruction of incentive systems to better align with public-welfare objectives. These insights offer valuable lessons for other developing countries pursuing similar health system transformations under complex socioeconomic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.