Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025
Time-course of muscular stress and fatigue markers following different soccer small-sided games: evidence from a randomized crossover study.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-intensity exercises with substantial mechanical demands can contribute to greater muscular loading, potentially increasing fatigue and potentially increasing fatigue and requiring careful load-management for preventing injury and enhancing recovery planning. This study aimed to compare the effects of 2v2, 4v4, and 6v6 small-sided games (SSG) formats on muscle stiffness, creatine kinase levels, and reactive strength index (RSI) immediately post-exercise and 24 hours thereafter. Methods: A randomized crossover design evaluated 36 male under-23 players from two regional-level amateur football teams. Participants completed 2v2, 4v4, and 6v6 over three weeks in a counterbalanced sequence, with assessments at baseline, immediately after, and 24 hours post-session. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was always assessed after SSGs, while muscle stiffness, creatine kinase and RSI were measured in all the time points. Results: Muscle stiffness was higher in 2v2 than 4v4 (MD = 21.722, p < .001) and 6v6 (MD = 19.514, Conclusions: The results suggest that 2v2 games lead to significantly higher muscle stiffness and perceived exertion, while eliciting higher CK levels and lower RSI compared to 4v4 and 6v6 formats. This suggests that small-sided games impose greater neuromuscular and muscular stress, likely due to the higher intensity typical of these formats. Coaches may therefore consider these demands when managing training loads and when planning recovery to potentially reduce excessive residual fatigue and support readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.