ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Optimizing polymorphic tomato picking detection: improved YOLOv8n architecture to tackle data under complex environments.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In modern agriculture, tomatoes, as key economic crops, face challenges during harvesting due to complex growth environments; traditional object detection technologies are limited by performance and struggle to accurately identify and locate ripe and small-target tomatoes under leaf occlusion and uneven illumination. Methods: To address these issues, this study sets YOLOv8n as the baseline model, focusing on improving it to enhance performance per tomato detection's core needs. First, it analyzes YOLOv8n's inherent bottlenecks in feature extraction and small-target recognition, then proposes targeted schemes: specifically, to boost feature extraction, a Space-to-Depth convolution module (SPD) is introduced by restructuring convolutional operations; to improve small-target detection, a dedicated small-target detection layer is added and integrated with the Parallelized Patch-Aware Attention mechanism (PPA); meanwhile, to balance performance and efficiency, a lightweight Slim-Neck structure and a self-developed Detect_CBAM detection head are adopted; finally, the Distance-Intersection over Union loss function (DIoU) optimizes gradient distribution during training. Experiments are conducted on the self-built "tomato_dataset" (7,160 images, divided into 5,008 for training, 720 for validation, 1,432 for testing) with evaluation metrics including bounding box precision, recall, mAP@0.5, mAP@0.5:0.95, Parameters, and FLOPS, and performance comparisons made with mainstream YOLO models (YOLOv5n, YOLOv6n, YOLOv8n), lightweight models (SSD-MobileNetv2, EfficientDet-D0), and two-stage algorithms (Faster R-CNN, Cascade R-CNN). Results: Results show the improved model achieves 89.6% precision, 87.3% recall, 93.5% mAP@0.5, 58.6% mAP@0.5:0.95, significantly outperforming YOLOv8n and most comparative models, and the two-stage algorithms in both detection accuracy and efficiency. Discussion: In conclusion, this study solves detection problems of ripe and small-target tomatoes in polymorphic environments, improves the model's accuracy and robustness, provides reliable technical support for automated harvesting, and contributes to modern agricultural intelligent development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.