ArticleJugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong2026
Operational Outcomes and Future Directions of a Joint Public-private Infection Control Simulation Training Program.
Article in Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the operational outcomes and evaluate the effectiveness of a newly implemented joint public-private infection control simulation training program. This initiative was designed to strengthen the collaborative capacity between healthcare facilities and local governments to effectively respond to healthcare-associated infection outbreaks. Methods: The simulation training involved 10 sessions, with a total of 422 participants, comprising 263 healthcare personnel and 159 local government officials. Scenarios and manuals were developed to reflect the domestic healthcare environment. Evaluation methods included quantitative pre- and post-training surveys and qualitative assessments from an operational workshop. Statistical analyses employed paired t-tests and, where appropriate, the Wilcoxon test. Results: All 422 participants completed the simulation training. Post-training assessments indicated statistically significant improvements in participants' knowledge, which increased from 10.0 (±1.4) to 10.5 (±1.0); perception competency, which increased from 4.5 (±0.5) to 4.7 (±0.4); and performance competency, which increased from 3.4 (±0.8) to 4.0 (±0.7). The overall satisfaction rate averaged 4.7 points. Qualitative workshop assessments confirmed that facilitators played a crucial role in moderating discussions, enhancing situational comprehension, and guiding problem-solving. Conclusions: The simulation training, facilitated by skilled moderators, significantly enhanced participants' knowledge, perception, and performance competencies. Based on these findings, future improvements should focus on refining scenarios to better delineate the roles of local governments, diversifying courses to address practical needs, and enhancing the operational systems for facilitators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.