Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Improving learning outcomes of medical terminology course through classroom-based gamified crossword puzzle activities.

Aziz Jamal, Ning Liu, Yunfei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aziz JamalHealth Administration Program, Faculty of Business & Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Puncak Alam Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.
Ning LiuDepartment of Environmental Epidemiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yunfei LiDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Active learning strategies are widely promoted to enhance student engagement and knowledge retention in higher education. In health administration education, mastery of medical terminology is essential, yet students often experience difficulty with recall and application. Crossword puzzles have been proposed as a practical instructional tool to support terminology learning, but empirical evidence in this context remains limited. Methods: This study examined the association between the use of crossword puzzles as learning aids and academic performance in a medical terminology course. A non-equivalent control group post-test-only design was employed. The sample comprised 211 s-year undergraduate health administration students enrolled in a 14-week course. Paper-based crossword puzzles were introduced in week 5 and implemented over 9 weeks. Independent t-tests were used to examine group differences, followed by multiple linear regression analysis to adjust for relevant covariates. Treatment effect analyses estimated the average treatment effect (ATE), average treatment effect on the treated (ATET), and average treatment effect on the non-treated (ATENT). Result: Students who used crossword puzzles demonstrated higher scores across individual assessment components and total test scores compared with the control group ( Discussion: The findings indicate that crossword puzzles are positively associated with higher performance in medical terminology assessments, supporting their role as a supplementary learning strategy. Students with weaker foundational knowledge may require additional instructional support. Given the observational study design, the findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal.

Indexed as

crossword puzzleshealth administrationlearning aidsmedical terminologystudent performancetreatment effect

Identifiers

PMID41626232
PMCPMC12855051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.