Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626197›Full record

ReviewInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases2026

The Landscape on Access to Maternal and Child Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Africa: A Scoping Review.

Delia Chikuse, Abebe Sorsa Badacho, Jeannine Uwimana-Nicol, Lynn Hendricks, Juliet Charity Yauka Nyasulu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Delia ChikuseDepartment of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division Health Systems and Public Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, sun.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6324-5013
Abebe Sorsa BadachoDepartment of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division Health Systems and Public Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, sun.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-8298
Jeannine Uwimana-NicolDepartment of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre of Evidence-Based HealthCare, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, sun.ac.za.
Lynn HendricksDepartment of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division Health Systems and Public Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, sun.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0382-4163
Juliet Charity Yauka NyasuluDepartment of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division Health Systems and Public Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, sun.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1158-6302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In early March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic. In South Africa, the first case was confirmed in early March 2020. According to the WHO, disruptions in essential services due to the COVID-19 pandemic occurred worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic affected access to maternal and child health (MCH) services in many countries, including South Africa. The study aimed to map and describe the existing evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the access to and delivery of maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) services in South Africa. Methodology: This was a scoping review of studies published between 2020 and 2023. We searched databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. Data were exported to the Rayyan software, where screening, checking of duplicates, and selection of final studies for review were performed. The information from the identified studies was exported to ATLAS.ti 23.1 software for analysis. Content analysis was performed, and data were presented in predetermined themes using the MCH cascade. Results: The results from 25 articles showed a mixed view, whereby some studies showed a decrease at the beginning of the pandemic in April 2020, in the uptake of family planning, antenatal care, labor and delivery, postnatal care, under-five immunizations, and cervical cancer screening services. However, other studies found increased uptake of family planning, antenatal care, labor and delivery, and under-five immunization services. Some studies showed resilience in the overall first antenatal visits, adolescents' visits to family planning, and postnatal care, as they remained constant. Conclusion: The findings show both positive and negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on MNCH services in South Africa. While the pandemic significantly disrupted access to essential services, some areas demonstrated resilience, with increased visits for antenatal care, adolescent family planning, and postnatal services. These insights are critical for guiding decision-makers, health managers, and frontline healthcare workers in preparing for future public health emergencies. Ensuring continuity of MNCH services during crises must be a priority. Strengthening the health system and building resilience are essential to safeguard MCH, even in the face of disruptions.

Indexed as

child∗ healthchildrenCOVID-19effects of COVID-19low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)maternal and child health servicesmaternal health“South Africa.”women

Identifiers

PMID41626197
PMCPMC12854166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.