ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Collision tumor of endometrial hepatoid adenocarcinoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma: a rare case and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial hepatoid adenocarcinoma (HAC) is an exceedingly rare tumor. Histologically, the tumor is predominantly characterized by HAC with additional components, as documented in previous reports. The coexistence of endometrial HAC and endometrial stromal sarcoma in collision tumors is exceptionally uncommon. To our knowledge, this case represents only the second documented instance of such a collision tumor. Case presentation: A 69-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with abnormal uterine bleeding, and her serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration was 8926 ng/mL. The initial biopsy revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Subsequent postoperative histopathological evaluation confirmed the coexistence of endometrial HAC and endometrial stromal sarcoma. Notably, according to imaging, gross examination, and microscopy, the two tumor components were separated by distinct contact areas without evidence of migration or intermingling. The patient developed pulmonary metastases within 40 days of surgery and eventually died of the disease. Conclusion: Endometrial hepatoid adenocarcinoma is an exceptionally rare tumor that frequently coexists with other pathological components. Preoperative diagnosis remains challenging, and definitive characterization relies predominantly on postoperative evaluation, particularly immunohistochemical analysis. These tumors exhibit marked heterogeneity and aggressiveness, with a propensity for lung metastasis and an overall poor prognosis. Due to the limited number of reported cases, there is no established consensus regarding the optimal treatment. Some case reports suggest that the development of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the uterus may have some correlation with endometriosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.