Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626164›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

The concurrence of lung malignancies and organizing pneumonia.

Srikanth Vedachalam, Mohammad Freihat, Ahmed K Alomari, Catherine R Sears, Nawar Al Nasrallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Srikanth VedachalamDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Mohammad FreihatDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Ahmed K AlomariDivision of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Catherine R SearsDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Occupational Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,  United States.
Nawar Al NasrallahDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Occupational Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN,  United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Organizing pneumonia (OP) is often considered a benign finding, but in some cases, it may be associated with underlying malignancy. With the increasing use of minimally invasive biopsy techniques, understanding the relationship between OP and lung cancer is critical to avoid delayed or missed diagnoses. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of OP and lung malignancy and report characteristics of these cases. Material and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of all lung pathology reports at Indiana University from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2023, encompassing over 8,000 cases. Cases with histopathologic diagnoses of OP with and without lung malignancy were identified; relevant clinical, radiologic, and follow-up data were extracted. Using language extraction, we identified pathology cases showing both organizing pneumonia and carcinoma (Cohort 1) and transbronchial biopsies identified as "organizing pneumonia" (Cohort 2). Cohort 2 was selected to reflect current clinical practice. Results: In Cohort 1 (n=57), 88% of samples demonstrating both organizing pneumonia and malignancy were obtained via surgical resection. Among these, squamous cell carcinoma accounted for 46% and adenocarcinoma for 37% of cases, with all T-stages represented (44% T1, 29% T2, 16% T3, and 11% T4). In this cohort, thirty-eight prior biopsy samples prior to surgery were reviewed; 76% revealed malignancy, but none showed definitive organizing pneumonia likely due to focal nature of OP. Cohort 2 (n=40), 7.5% of patients in whom organizing pneumonia was identified through minimally invasive bronchoscopic sampling were ultimately diagnosed with concurrent lung cancer. All required repeat tissue sampling for cancer diagnosis. Conclusion: Lung malignancy is known to be associated with OP. A high degree of suspicion should be maintained if OP is found on minimally invasive techniques, particularly if malignancy is strongly suspected.

Indexed as

lung adenocarcinomalung cancerorganizing pneumoniasquamous cell carcinomatransbronchial lung biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41626164
PMCPMC12855115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.