ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
MTPC integration for improved diagnosis of pleural effusion.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pleural effusion is clinically common with diverse etiologies, and differentiating benign from malignant cases is critical for treatment planning and prognosis assessment. Traditional single diagnostic methods have inherent limitations, leading to diagnostic challenges. This study aimed to develop a multi-modal diagnostic panel (MTPC) to improve the accuracy and efficiency of initial pleural effusion diagnosis. Methods: A total of 369 patients (264 with malignant pleural effusion and 105 with benign pleural effusion) were enrolled retrospectively. The MTPC panel integrated four diagnostic modalities: methylation biomarkers (PTGER4 and SHOX2), tumor markers (CEA and CYFRA21-1), DNA ploidy analysis, and cytological examination. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Additional analyses were performed for cytology-undetermined and cytology-negative cases. Results: Among immunological tumor markers, CEA exhibited the highest specificity (98.1%) and CYFRA21-1 the highest sensitivity (56.8%). Combined PTGER4 and SHOX2 methylation detection achieved a sensitivity of 65.9% and specificity of 92.4%. The MTPC panel demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.8698, sensitivity of 90.2%, and specificity of 83.8%. In cytology-undetermined cases, MTPC reduced "cytology undetermined" reports by 78.4% and missed diagnoses via "negative" reports by 92.3%. Discussion: The MTPC panel effectively integrates molecular, immunological, chromosomal, and cytomorphological data, significantly improving the diagnostic efficiency of pleural effusion. It addresses the limitations of single diagnostic methods and provides more reliable evidence for clinicians, facilitating early and accurate differentiation of benign and malignant pleural effusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.