Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41626158›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Research progress on discharge readiness service practices for patients undergoing endometrial cancer surgery.

Xia Chen, Peijuan Tang, Chunjing Ma, Mei Su, Jiaxin Sun, Wenzhong Chang, Yaru Li, Yajuan Cui, Yanting Wang, Yuchong Hu and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xia ChenDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Peijuan TangDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Chunjing MaDepartment of Gynaecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Mei SuDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Jiaxin SunDepartment of Clinical Medical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Wenzhong ChangDepartment of Nursing, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yaru LiDepartment of Nursing, Ordos Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yajuan CuiSchool of Nursing, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yanting WangDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yuchong HuDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Jia WangDepartment of Gynaecology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yinyi WeiDepartment of Gynaecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This narrative review aims to synthesize and evaluate existing evidence and practices regarding discharge readiness services for patients undergoing endometrial cancer (EC) surgery, with the goal of providing a reference for clinical practice and future research. Background: The incidence of EC is rising globally. With the widespread adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and minimally invasive techniques, hospital stays are shortening, making effective discharge planning crucial for ensuring a safe transition to home and preventing readmissions. Methods: As a narrative review, this article involved a comprehensive but non-systematic examination of literature from PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases, focusing on key components of discharge readiness. These components include assessment tools, service content development, implementation processes, and outcome evaluation. The synthesis prioritized recent evidence and internationally recognized guidelines. Results: The review identifies that while generic discharge assessment tools are valuable, they require adaptation to address the specific needs of EC patients (e.g., lymphedema risk, sexual health). Effective service implementation relies on a systematic interdisciplinary collaboration model and nurse-led, personalized education (e.g., using the teach-back method). The integration of digital health platforms shows promise for supporting post-discharge care. Outcome evaluation should encompass both clinical indicators (e.g., 30-day readmission rates) and patient-reported outcomes (e.g., using the Health Education Impact Questionnaire). Current challenges include a lack of standardized pathways and fragmented community resources. Conclusion: Discharge readiness is a critical determinant of recovery quality for EC surgical patients. This review consolidates core components and processes into a practical framework, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary collaboration, patient-centered education, and technology integration. Future efforts should focus on developing standardized, culturally adapted pathways and conducting robust comparative effectiveness research to establish high-quality, evidence-based service systems. Relevance to clinical practice: This study focuses on the development of core components and processes for systematic discharge readiness services for postoperative endometrial cancer patients, as well as the identification of practice challenges. The findings advocate for the clinical adoption of standardized frameworks and the enhancement of implementation capacity to optimize discharge transitions, patient recovery, and continuity of care.

Indexed as

discharge readiness serviceendometrial cancernarrative reviewsurgical patientstransitional care

Identifiers

PMID41626158
PMCPMC12851997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.