ReviewBlood neoplasia2026
Addition of anti-CD38 mAb in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: advancing toward quadruplet induction regimens.
Review in Blood neoplasia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incorporation of CD38-targeted monoclonal antibodies into induction therapy has improved outcome in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), yet the benefit across risk subgroups remains controversial. We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify studies comparing induction regimens with and without anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab or isatuximab) and assessed the efficacy and safety of anti-CD38-based induction regimens in NDMM. Primary outcomes were minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity and progression-free survival (PFS). Eleven trials encompassing 5588 patients, including 915 with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM), were included. Anti-CD38-containing regimens significantly increased MRD-negativity in both transplant-eligible (TE; pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-3.11) and transplant-ineligible (TIE; pooled OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.20-4.84) patients. Among TE patients, MRD-negativity improved in both HRMM (pooled OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.41-2.88) and standard-risk MM (pooled OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.99-3.84). Anti-CD38 therapy also significantly prolonged PFS in TE (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38-0.69) and TIE NDMM (pooled HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49-0.61), with an overall survival benefit observed in TIE patients. PFS improvement was consistent across cytogenetic risk and clinical subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 infections and hematologic toxicities occurred more frequently with anti-CD38 regimens. In summary, anti-CD38-based induction improves depth of response and PFS across NDMM populations, including high-risk disease, with increased but manageable toxicity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.