ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Predicting multiple sclerosis prognosis using AI and machine learning: integrating clinical, immunological, and radiological variables.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relapse prediction and individualized treatment-effect modeling in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate prediction of disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a critical challenge in clinical management. This study investigates the utility of supervised machine learning (ML) models in predicting clinical disability, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and radiological activity based on MRI lesion changes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Methods: Using peripheral cytokine profiles (IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-10) along with patient metadata (e.g., sex, family history, relapse status), 43 ML classifiers were trained and evaluated for their ability to discriminate between mild and moderate disability (EDSS <1 vs >1, and <2.5 vs >2.5), and to predict new MRI lesions in 15 MS patients. Results: Ensemble models consistently outperformed simpler algorithms. For EDSS prediction, Random Forest achieved 90.1% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity, while Simple Logistic Regression reached 92.6% for both metrics when patient ID was included. In predicting new MRI lesions, Random Subspace classifiers performed best, with 82.4% sensitivity and specificity. Discussion: These findings suggest that combining cytokine-based immune signatures with machine learning strategies can provide clinically meaningful predictions of both functional disability and radiological progression. Such tools may support more proactive patient monitoring, informed therapeutic decision-making, and risk stratification in the care of RRMS. Further validation in prospective cohorts is warranted to support clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.