ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Virtual reality-based assessment of visuo-vestibular integration in vestibular migraine and migraine: static and dynamic visual vertical and rod-and-frame tests.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is the most common cause of episodic vertigo, yet its diagnostic markers remain limited. Perception of verticality, measured via static subjective visual vertical (SVV), dynamic SVV (DSVV), and the rod-and-frame test (RFT), provides insight into visuo-vestibular integration. Traditional approaches, however, often test these paradigms in isolation with limited ecological validity. Objective: To evaluate a novel virtual reality (VR)-based protocol combining SVV, DSVV, and RFT to characterize visuo-vestibular integration in VM, migraine without vestibular symptoms (M), and healthy controls (HC). Methods: Fifty participants (VM Results: VM patients exhibited significantly greater SVV deviations than HC ( Conclusion: VM is characterized by difficulties in dynamic and visually complex situations, rather than static balance problems. Combining DSVV and RFT with SVV enhances diagnostic sensitivity, explains patients' daily challenges, and supports rehabilitation approaches aimed at reducing visual dependence and improving sensory balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.