ArticleBrain & spine2026
Organizational management of moderate and severe paediatric traumatic brain injury: results from a European survey.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Management of moderate/severe paediatric traumatic brain injury (mspTBI) varies across Europe. The decline in case numbers perceived in many regions raises concerns about maintaining high-quality, sustainable care. Research question: This study aimed to examine the organization of mspTBI management in Europe, focusing on expertise availability, guideline adherence, neuromonitoring use, and clinician's confidence in care delivery through a survey. Material and methods: A 34-question survey was distributed to European neurosurgical and intensive care communities. Only hospitals treating children with mspTBI were included. Centres were stratified by their catchment population size and their access to dedicated expertise. Results: Seventy-six institutions from 23 countries responded. Most centres reported a mspTBI case load of less than 20 children per year. Access to paediatric anesthesiology was significantly associated with centre size (p = 0.001), while access to paediatric neurosurgery, intensive or neurointensive care was not. Most centres (96 %) reported adherence to (inter)national guidelines. Intracranial pressure (78.7 %) and transcranial Doppler (70.7 %) were the most frequently available/used neuromonitoring modalities. Confidence in managing mspTBI was significantly higher in centres with paediatric neurosurgeons and, for older children, paediatric neuro-intensivists. Discussion: This first European survey examining organizational management of mspTBI reveals a low overall caseload and uneven access to paediatric expertise. Confidence in managing mspTBI correlates with availability of paediatric subspecialists. Guidelines are widely applied, independent of expert availability, but are alone insufficient to ensure treatment confidence. This finding underscores the need for improved guidelines and better access to paediatric neurotrauma expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.