ArticleCureus2025
Implementing a Hybrid Digital-Physical Health Dialogue Model in a Rural Japanese Community: A Technical Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rural communities often face structural and psychological barriers to healthcare access, particularly among older and socially isolated populations. Conventional clinic-based services may not adequately address early, ambiguous health concerns or facilitate low-threshold help-seeking. This technical report describes the implementation of a hybrid digital-physical health dialogue model designed to enhance accessibility, trust, and sustained engagement in a rural Japanese community. The intervention integrated an anonymous, free health consultation service delivered via the LINE messaging platform (LINE Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with face-to-face dialogue sessions conducted at local community centers. Healthcare professionals and a community-based organization collaboratively facilitated both components. Rather than evaluating effectiveness, this report focuses on the implementation process and on observational insights from routine operations, including staff field notes, informal debriefings, and participant feedback. The digital consultation service served as a low-threshold entry point, enabling residents to raise health-related concerns early. Over time, some participants transitioned from online consultations to in-person dialogues, which may indicate gradual trust-building and increased confidence in engagement. Face-to-face sessions appeared to foster mutual recognition, peer support, and a shared understanding of community health concerns. Healthcare professionals reported enhanced contextual awareness of residents' lived experiences. Key challenges included digital exclusion among some older adults, reliance on voluntary human resources, and the absence of formal outcome evaluation. The hybrid digital-physical health dialogue model demonstrates practical feasibility as an implementation approach to support accessible and relational health dialogue in a rural setting. While not an effectiveness study, the findings provide transferable insights for designing community-based, low-threshold health dialogue initiatives that balance accessibility, trust, and sustainability in resource-limited contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.