ReviewCureus2025
Decommissioning and Safe Disposal of Vaccine Cold Chain Equipment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Focusing on Processes, Risks, and Practical Challenges.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunization programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rely on large fleets of powered cold chain equipment (CCE), much of which is now aging, inefficient, or technologically obsolete. While substantial investments have expanded and modernized CCE inventories, formal frameworks for end-of-life management lag behind, and obsolete units frequently accumulate in facilities, yards, and warehouses. Inadequate decommissioning and disposal create environmental, occupational, programmatic, and financial risks that are poorly documented and weakly integrated into cold chain and healthcare waste management policies. We conducted a narrative, process-focused review of electrical vaccine refrigerators and freezers in low- and middle-income settings. Normative guidance from global health, environment, and waste agencies was combined with national policies, program and evaluation reports, healthcare waste management assessments, and selected peer-reviewed literature. Sources were included if they described policies, procedures, or practices for decommissioning, removing, or disposing of vaccine CCE. Extracted information was organized along end-of-life lifecycle stages and synthesized narratively. The review identifies a systems framework in which end-of-life CCE presents a complex hazard profile, including ozone-depleting and high-GWP (global warming potential) refrigerants, compressor oils, foams, electronics, and, for some solar units, batteries. Decommissioning can be structured into a governance setup followed by six operational steps from notification and technical condemnation through decontamination, removal, transport, and licensed final treatment, supported by cross-cutting documentation and reporting. When these steps are absent or weak, environmental and climate risks, occupational and community exposures, vaccine potency loss,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.