ReviewCureus2025
Clinical Benefits and Risks of Haptoglobin Therapy in Hemolytic Disorders of Diverse Etiologies: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemolytic disorders release cell-free hemoglobin (CFH), a potent nephrotoxin and oxidant. Haptoglobin, an endogenous plasma protein, binds CFH to facilitate its clearance. While haptoglobin therapy is a promising strategy to mitigate CFH-induced organ injury, its clinical efficacy and safety across different hemolytic conditions remain unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the clinical benefits and risks of haptoglobin therapy in patients with hemolytic disorders of diverse etiologies. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase from 2015 to 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting on haptoglobin therapy (administered or endogenous) and clinical outcomes in patients with hemolysis were eligible. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. A narrative synthesis was performed due to study heterogeneity. Five observational studies were included, involving cardiac surgery, severe burn, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. In cardiac surgery, haptoglobin administration was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) (adjusted OR = 0.54). In contrast, no clinical benefit was observed in severe burn patients. Consistently, low endogenous haptoglobin levels were a strong, independent predictor of AKI and major adverse kidney events (MAKE) across all clinical settings. No significant adverse events were directly attributed to haptoglobin administration. The benefit of haptoglobin therapy is context-dependent, demonstrating significant renal protection in cardiac surgery but not in severe burns. Low endogenous haptoglobin is a robust biomarker for AKI risk. These findings support a targeted, biomarker-guided approach to haptoglobin therapy, rather than universal application. Future randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy in selected high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.