ArticleCureus2025
Side Effects of First-Line Anti-tubercular Therapy (ATT): Does an Alternative Regimen Exist?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Setting Standard anti-tubercular therapy (ATT) typically involves a regimen of 2 months of HRZE intensive phase, followed by 4 months of HRE continuation phase - 2HRZE/4HRE (H-isoniazid, R-rifampicin, Z-pyrazinamide, E-ethambutol). However, adverse effects and comorbidities often necessitate alternative non-standardized regimens. Objective The aim of the study was to identify and evaluate the use, rationale, and outcome of non-standardized ATT regimens in patients with drug-sensitive tuberculosis. Method Our prospective observational study included 148 patients at a tertiary care hospital who were prescribed non-standard ATT due to various adverse effects and associated medical comorbidities on or after presentation. Patients were followed up through the intensive phase (two months) of the Directly Observed Treatment, Short-course (DOTS) regimen only, and their progress was assessed before the onset of the continuation phase. Results The most common reasons for non-standardized ATT were drug-induced liver injury (DILI) - 53.4%(79), and gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance - 21.6% (32). HRE was the most frequently used alternative regimen prescribed to 35.1% (52) of patients. At the end of the intensive phase, 76% (108) of patients reported clinical improvement, and 60.1%(89) showed radiological resolution. Three patients passed away during the course of the study, while four were lost to follow-up. No adverse effects were observed with modified regimens. Conclusion Non-standardized ATT regimens are often necessary due to adverse drug reactions, particularly hepatotoxicity. Most patients experienced symptomatic and radiological improvement on a non-standardized ATT regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.