Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41625882›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Program Evaluation of the Family Adoption Program for Medical Graduates in India: A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC) and Stakeholder Analysis in a Medical College in Assam.

Sthapana Sharma, Sonali G Choudhari, Deepjyoti Das, Ashfia Habib, Jutika Ojah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sthapana SharmaDepartment of Community Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.
Sonali G ChoudhariDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education & Research, Wardha, IND.
Deepjyoti DasDepartment of Community Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.
Ashfia HabibDepartment of Community Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.
Jutika OjahDepartment of Community Medicine, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Family Adoption Program (FAP), launched by India's National Medical Commission in 2019, connects medical undergraduates with families to understand community health challenges and social determinants affecting health in Assam. The aim of the study was to evaluate FAP through Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC) and stakeholder analysis at a medical college in Assam.

methodsA mixed-method evaluation was conducted among 150 MBBS students, 150 adopted families, faculty, health workers, and community leaders from June to October 2025 using validated Google Forms, interviews, and focus group discussions.

resultsAmong 150 students, 148 (98.6%) reported positive engagement and 146 (97.2%) cited the FAP as their first field-based exposure. All faculty (100%) supported FAP's Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) alignment, though four (33.3%) students noted increased workload. Healthcare workers appreciated the gains in community awareness but highlighted communication gaps and supply shortages. Families valued health education but desired continuity and access to screening tools. The SWOC analysis identified strong engagement and community acceptance as strengths, while training gaps and logistical constraints were the primary challenges.

conclusionFAP effectively develops compassionate, community-aware physicians. Structured training, essential medical supplies, clear communication protocols, and stakeholder involvement can strengthen FAP as a model for community-based medical education across India.

Indexed as

community medicinefamily adoption programmedical educationmixed-methods studyprogram evaluationstakeholder analysis

Identifiers

PMID41625882
PMCPMC12851891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.