ArticleCureus2025
Spinal Subdural Hematoma Initially Misdiagnosed, Revealed by CT Brain Window Settings.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case demonstrates that meticulous physical examination and optimized computed tomography (CT) windowing are crucial for diagnosing spinal subdural hematoma (SSH) when it mimics stroke. We present a 43-year-old man with a stroke-like onset of unilateral leg weakness that progressed to paraplegia. While a sensory level at T4 strongly suggested a spinal cord lesion, a standard trunk CT was initially interpreted as normal. The diagnosis of a C7-T4 SSH was ultimately established by re-reviewing the CT using brain window settings and was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Despite emergent surgical decompression, the patient had minimal neurological recovery. This report underscores two key lessons: the diagnostic priority of spinal-specific signs (e.g., a sensory level) over misleading motor deficits, and the utility of applying brain window settings as a simple, effective technique to avoid misdiagnosing this critical condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.