ArticleCureus2025
Ricochet Nail Gun Penetration of Zone II With a Deep Cervical Trajectory: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nail gun injuries to the neck are rare but potentially serious due to the concentration of vascular and aerodigestive structures within this region. Although considered low-velocity devices, ricochet mechanisms can create unpredictable trajectories, allowing nails to penetrate more deeply than expected. We report the case of a 49-year-old construction worker who sustained a zone II neck injury after a nail ricocheted off a hard surface and struck the left side of his neck. He arrived hemodynamically stable with only localized swelling and no airway or neurological symptoms. A CT angiography identified a curved metallic nail extending toward the C6-C7 level, closely abutting the left vertebral artery with a subtle non-obstructive intimal irregularity. Given the depth of penetration and proximity to major vessels, the patient underwent a selective neck exploration through an anterior sternocleidomastoid approach, allowing for the safe identification and removal of the nail under direct vision. Postoperative imaging confirmed preserved vertebral artery flow, and the patient recovered without complications. This case highlights how seemingly minor external findings may conceal a deep cervical trajectory, particularly when the mechanism involves ricochet. It reinforces the value of CT angiography in defining injury extent and supporting selective exploration in zone II penetrating trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.