ReviewCureus2025
A Coordinated Project-Management Approach to Multisite Implementation of Motor-Rehabilitation Programs for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in United States Healthcare Systems: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor impairments are common in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and contribute to reduced functional independence, participation, and quality of life. Although motor-rehabilitation interventions can improve motor and adaptive outcomes, services are often fragmented, inconsistently delivered, and difficult to scale beyond single clinical settings. Multisite implementation of ASD motor-rehabilitation programs remains limited, underscoring the need for coordinated approaches that address both clinical and organizational challenges. This integrative narrative review synthesizes representative literature on motor-rehabilitation interventions for children with ASD alongside implementation-science and project-management frameworks relevant to multisite healthcare delivery in the United States. A broad search of peer-reviewed literature and policy sources published between 2000 and 2025 was conducted. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively with attention to implementation-relevant factors, governance structures, and scalability considerations; no quantitative synthesis or statistical analysis was performed. The reviewed literature indicates that motor-rehabilitation interventions can improve motor proficiency, adaptive behavior, and participation in children with ASD. However, the evidence base is dominated by small, single-site studies with substantial heterogeneity in intervention design and outcome reporting. Key barriers to multisite implementation include variability in workforce training, infrastructure, reimbursement models, data systems, and family engagement across settings. Implementation-science frameworks (e.g., the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM), and Normalization Process Theory) and project-management methodologies offer complementary strategies to address these barriers but are rarely integrated within ASD motor-rehabilitation research. Drawing on these domains, this review proposes a Coordinated Project-Management Framework to guide multisite implementation through iterative phases of initiation, planning, delivery, monitoring and evaluation, and sustainability. Scaling effective motor-rehabilitation services for children with ASD will require coordinated, multisite implementation rather than isolated clinic-based efforts. Future research should prioritize piloting and evaluating this framework in real-world healthcare networks using hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs to improve access, consistency, and equity in ASD motor rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.